Conflicts of interest can lead to reputational damage and, in extreme cases, criminal sanctions. According to the District Court, there was no plausible argument that the victim consented to sexual relations with his murderer, given the bruises on the victim's neck, blood marks showing the victim was stabbed before or during sexual intercourse, and, most important, petitioner's insistence on testifying at trial that he had never met the victim. 2017-04-02T05:15:00Z. It would be absurd, after all, to suggest that a judge should sit quiescent in the face of an apparent risk that a lawyer's conflict will render representation illusory and the formal trial a waste of time, emotion, and a good deal of public money. Yet Saunders did nothing to counter the mother's assertion in the post-trial victim-impact statement given to the trial judge that "`all [she] lived for was that boy,'" id., at 421; see also App. Brief for Petitioner 21.3 He relies upon the language in the remand instruction directing the trial court to grant a new revocation hearing if it determines that "an actual conflict of interest existed," Wood, 450 U.S., at 273, without requiring a further determination that the conflict adversely affected counsel's performance. The term "conflict of interest" in the legal world refers to a situation wherein an individual is in a position to exploit his professional capacity for his own benefit. It arises from the fact that the Commonwealth seeks to execute a defendant, having provided that defendant with a lawyer who, only yesterday, represented the victim. To answer that question, we must examine those cases in some detail.1. Ante, at 10. United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 658 (1984). Robin Thicke versus Marvin Gaye. Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991). Pp. Brief for Respondent 34. (b)This Court rejects petitioner's argument that the remand instruction in Wood, directing the trial court to grant a new hearing if it determined that "an actual conflict of interest existed," id., at 273, established that where the trial judge neglects a duty to inquire into a potential conflict the defendant, to obtain reversal, need only show that his lawyer was subject to a conflict of interest, not that the conflict adversely affected counsel's performance. In those cases where the potential conflict is in fact an actual one, only inquiry will enable the judge to avoid all possibility of reversal by either seeking waiver or replacing a conflicted attorney. No man can be supposed to be indifferent to the knowledge of facts, which work directly on his interests, or bear on the freedom of his choice of counsel. ' Ante, at 8 (emphasis deleted). Ante, at 8-9. At that point in the proceeding, by definition, the defendant has no lawyer to protect his interests and must rely entirely on the judge. The judge's duty independent of objection, as described in Cuyler and Wood, is made concrete by reversal for failure to honor it. If youd like to retain your premium access and save 20%, you can opt to pay annually at the end of the trial. As used in the remand instruction, "an actual conflict of interest" meant precisely a conflict that affected counsel's performance--as opposed to a mere theoretical division of loyalties. The District Court said the same for counsel's alleged dereliction at the sentencing phase. When the possibility of conflict does not appear until a proceeding is over and any enquiry must be retrospective, a defendant must show actual conflict with adverse effect. On these facts, we conclude that the Sixth Amendment imposed upon the trial court no affirmative duty to inquire into the propriety of multiple representation." 15 Nov 2022 Book Stop Ignoring Bad Behavior: 6 Tips for Better Ethics at Work by Pamela Reynolds Wood v. Georgia, 450 U.S. 261, 267, 272 (1981). The same judge then called Saunders the next business day to ask if he would "do her a favor" and represent the only person charged with having killed the victim. Sullivan, the defendant at the first trial, had consented to joint representation by the same lawyers retained by the two other accused, because he could not afford counsel of his own. If it were otherwise, the judge's duty would not be limited to cases where the attorney is suspected of harboring a conflict of interest. See, e.g., Campbell v. Rice, 265 F.3d 878, 884-885, 888 (CA9 2001); Ciak v. United States, 59 F.3d 296, 302 (CA2 1995). In a capital case, the evidence submitted by both sides regarding the victim's character may easily tip the scale of the jury's choice between life or death. See id., at 605 ("[T]he record here reflects that, as far as Saunders was concerned, his allegiance to Hall, `[e]nded when I walked into the courtroom and they told me he was dead and the case was gone'") (quoting Hearing Tr. The objection requirement works elsewhere because the objecting lawyer believes that he sights an error being committed by the judge or opposing counsel. We have long recognized the paramount importance of the right to effective assistance of counsel. In Wood, according to the majority, the trial court had notice, there was no objection on the record, and the defendant was required to show actual conflict and adverse effect. The state judge, however, did nothing to discharge her constitutional duty of care. The suppression of communication and truncated investigation that would unavoidably follow from such a decision would also make it difficult, if not altogether impossible, to establish the necessary level of trust that should characterize the "delicacy of relation" between attorney and client.2. This case comes to us with the finding that the judge who appointed Saunders knew or should have known of the risk that he would be conflicted owing to his prior appointment to represent the victim of the crime, 74 F.Supp. 1824). Compare Standard and Premium Digital here. The relevance of Saunders' prior representation of Hall to the new appointment was far too important to be concealed. What Is the Agency Problem? As a general matter, a defendant alleging a Sixth Amendment violation must demonstrate "a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Id., at 478. Indeed, even if Saunders had learned relevant information, the District Court found that he labored under the impression he had no continuing duty at all to his deceased client. The juvenile-court judge, whom circumstances had thrust into the unusual position of having to appoint counsel in a notorious capital case, certainly knew or had reason to know of the possibility that Saunders's 14-day representation of the murder victim, up to the start of the previous business day, may have created a risk of impairing his representation of Mickens in his upcoming murder trial. Unless it appears that there is good cause to believe no conflict of interest is likely to arise, the court shall take such measures as may be appropriate to protect each defendant's right to counsel.". Holloway, supra, at 491; see also Wood, supra, at 272, n.18. United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 658 (1984). Indeed, counsel said that he was no longer paid by the employer for his representation of the defendants once they were put on probation, id., at 281, n.7 (White, J., dissenting). as Amici Curiae 16 ("[T]he standard test to determine if a conflict is non-waiveable is whether a `disinterested lawyer would conclude that the client should not agree to the representation under the circumstances.' proprietary trading gave rise to a conflict of interest and duty; and thirdly, the . We granted certiorari to consider whether this violated the Equal Protection Clause, but during the course of our consideration certain disturbing circumstances came to our attention: At the probation-revocation hearing (as at all times since their arrest) the defendants had been represented by the lawyer for their employer (the owner of the business that purveyed the obscenity), and their employer paid the attorney's fees. Ante, at 9. Watson and Rayner paired a white rat and other objects with a loud noise to . A conflict of interest is inherent in this practice . The Wood footnote says that Sullivan does not preclude "raising a conflict-of-interest problem that is apparent in the record" and that "Sullivan mandates a reversal when the trial court has failed to make [the requisite] inquiry." Explainer: The Trumps' conflict of interest issues. See also, ABA Ann. The phrasing of the remand instruction confirms the conclusion that the Wood Court perceived the duty to enquire neglected by the judge as retrospective in nature: The "[state] court [on remand] should hold a hearing to determine whether the conflict of interest that this record strongly suggests actually existed at the time of the probation revocation or earlier." Sometimes, an institution desires one result rather than another for purely self-interested reasons. From the Court's vantage point, another compelling reason for suspecting a conflict of interests was the fact that the employer apparently paid for the appeal, in which counsel argued the equal protection question only, id., at 267, n.11; but, of course, this would have been unknown to the judge at the revocation hearing. "2 Id., at 346. Today, the former system has been skewed against recognizing judicial responsibility. 211-213; see also id., at 219. 435 U.S., at 489 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). This conclusion is a good example of why a case-by-case inquiry is required, rather than simply adopting an automatic rule of reversal. 17,733) (CC Me. We use The fallacy of the Government's argument, however, has been on the books since Wood was decided. As used in the remand instruction, however, we think "an actual conflict of interest" meant precisely a conflict that affected counsel's performance--as opposed to a mere theoretical division of loyalties. Id., at 347-348. of Oral Arg. This strategy was rejected as likely to backfire, not only by Saunders, but also by his co-counsel, who owed no duty to Hall. 435 U.S., at 487, 491. 3-14. Ibid. Wood is not easy to read, and I believe the majority misreads it. See Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980)"). And these are precisely the lawyers presenting the danger in no-objection cases; the savvy and ethical lawyer would comply with his professional duty to disclose conflict concerns to the court. The nub of the question before us is whether the principle established by these cases provides an exception to the general rule of Strickland under the circumstances of the present case. Dretke, an infamous capital case involving racial discrimination in jury selection. 18, 1977, sentencing). In retrospect, it seems obvious that the death penalty might have been avoided by acknowledging Mickens' involvement, but emphasizing the evidence suggesting that their sexual encounter was consensual. See App. Wood, supra, at 272, n.18. Loyalty to a client is also impaired when a lawyer cannot consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client because of the lawyer's other responsibilities or interests"). 450 U.S., at 262-263. 1979, No. Quite obviously, knowledge that the lawyer represented the victim would be a substantial obstacle to the development of such confidence. In this case, the relationship between an investment bank and a client (to whom it was providing advisory services in relation . United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 653-654 (1984) ("`Of all the rights that an accused person has, the right to be represented by counsel is by far the most pervasive for it affects his ability to assert any other rights he may have'") (citation omitted)). The different burdens on the Holloway and Cuyler defendants are consistent features of a coherent scheme for dealing with the problem of conflicted defense counsel; a prospective risk of conflict subject to judicial notice is treated differently from a retrospective claim that a completed proceeding was tainted by conflict, although the trial judge had not been derelict in any duty to guard against it. The basic defense at the guilt phase was that petitioner was not at the scene; this is hardly consistent with the theory that there was a consensual encounter. cookies 79-6027 (Mar. What's striking is that. Petitioner's description of roads not taken would entail two degrees of speculation. From the point of view of society, the action of the sovereign in taking the life of one of its citizens also differs dramatically from any other legitimate state action. The Commonwealth of Virginia seeks to put the petitioner, Walter Mickens, Jr., to death after having appointed to represent him as his counsel a lawyer who, at the time of the murder, was representing the very person Mickens was accused of killing. What is clear from Strickland and Holloway is that the right against ineffective assistance of counsel has as much to do with public confidence in the professionalism of lawyers as with the results of legal proceedings. 297. The same juvenile court judge who dismissed the charges against Hall later appointed Saunders to represent petitioner. But even assuming the unlikely case of a savvy lawyer who recognizes a potential conflict and does not know for sure whether to object timely on that basis as a matter of professional ethics, an objection on the record is still the most reliable factually sufficient trigger of the judicial duty to enquire, dereliction of which would result in a reversal, and it is therefore beyond the realm of reasonable conjecture to suggest that such a lawyer would forgo an objection on the chance that a court in postconviction proceedings may find an alternative factual basis giving rise to a duty to enquire. Since the Wood judge's duty was unlike the Holloway judge's obligation to take care for the future, it would have made no sense for the Wood Court to impose a Holloway remedy. order now. Because doubt "is the best means of competing with the 'body of fact' that exists in the mind of the general public. . See id., at 484; Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 70 (1942). Whether the lawyer's failure to press more aggressively for leniency was caused by a conflicting interest, for example, had never been explored at the trial level and there was no record to consult on the point.8 In deciding what to do, the Wood Court had two established procedural models to look to: Holloway's procedure of vacating judgment9 when a judge had failed to enquire into a prospective conflict, and Cuyler's procedure of determining whether the conflict that may well have occurred had actually occurred with some adverse effect. Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 344 (1980). We doubt that the deterrence of "judicial dereliction" that would be achieved by an automatic reversal rule is significantly greater. This assumption has not been challenged. The same trial judge presided over each stage of these proceedings. Case studies on conflicts of interest in government When Official Roles Conflict Local officials may sit on several bodies with conflicting priorities and constituencies. A Loyalist Township councillor faces a second integrity commissioner investigation after the first one found her to have violated the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act. It is the Court's rule that leads to an anomalous result. . See App. 532 U.S. 970 (2001). We Will Write a Custom Case Study Specifically. Because the appointing judge knew of the conflict, there is no need in this case to decide what should be done when the judge neither knows, nor should know, about the existence of an intolerable conflict. 2007, embodies Lord Millet's concern. Nor does the trial judge's failure to make the Sullivan-mandated inquiry often make it harder for reviewing courts to determine conflict and effect, particularly since those courts may rely on evidence and testimony whose importance only becomes established at the trial. The majority says that Wood holds that the distinction is between cases where counsel objected and all other cases, regardless of whether a trial court was put on notice prospectively in some way other than by an objection on the record. The duty of the Wood judge could only have been to enquire into the past (what had happened two years earlier at sentencing, the setting of probation 19 months later, the ensuing failures to pay, and the testimony that had already been given at the revocation hearing), just like the responsibility of the state and federal habeas courts reviewing the record in Cuyler in postconviction proceedings, see id., at 338-339. university [but do find a malicious, willful, deliberate, premeditated killing], then you shall find the defendant guilty of first degree murder. While the perceptive and conscientious lawyer (as in Holloway) needs nothing more than ethical duty to induce an objection, the venal lawyer is not apt to be reformed by a general rule that says his client will have an easier time reversing a conviction down the road if the lawyer calls attention to his own venality.10. The court nevertheless denied plaintiffs . The Court, in addition to ignoring the mandate of Wood, reads Sullivan too narrowly. But when, as in Sullivan, the judge lacked this knowledge, such a showing is required. " App. 119, 125-140 (1978); Lowenthal, Joint Representation in Criminal Cases: A Critical Appraisal, 64 Va. L.Rev. Id., at 481. Wells Fargo was fined $185 million by regulators, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.As our video " Conflict of Interest " indicates, it is often in an employee's best interest not to do what benefits his or her employer. The juridical system of nearly every country has worked . This duty was triggered either via defense counsel's objection, as was the case in Holloway, or some other "special circumstances" whereby the serious potential for conflict was brought to the attention of the trial court judge. Most Courts of Appeals, however, have applied Sullivan to claims of successive representation as well as to some insidious conflicts arising from a lawyer's self-interest. The parties do not dispute that the appointing judge in this case knew or reasonably should have known that Saunders had represented Hall on assault and battery charges brought against him by his mother and a separate concealed-weapon charge at the time of his murder. The first critical stage in the defense of a capital case is the series of pretrial meetings between the accused and his counsel when they decide how the case should be defended. On the merits, the Court of Appeals assumed that the juvenile court judge had neglected a duty to inquire into a potential conflict, but rejected petitioner's argument that this failure either mandated automatic reversal of his conviction or relieved him of the burden of showing that a conflict of interest adversely affected his representation. There may be doubt whether these failures were the result of incompetence or litigation strategy rather than a conflicting duty of loyalty to the victim or to self to avoid professional censure for failing to disclose the conflict risk to Mickens (though strategic choice seems unlikely given that Saunders did not even raise the possibility of a consent defense as an option to be considered). Under the majority's rule, however, it is precisely in the latter situation that the judge's incentive to take care is at its ebb. 11-16 in Wood v. Georgia, O.T. In the one case in which we have devised a remedy for such judicial dereliction, we held that the ensuing judgment of conviction must be reversed and the defendant afforded a new trial. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. Change the plan you will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the Settings & Account section. The vital guarantee of the Sixth Amendment would stand for little if the often uninformed decision to retain a particular lawyer could reduce or forfeit the defendant's entitlement to constitutional protection." There is not. Yet even with extensive investigation in post-trial proceedings, it will often prove difficult, if not impossible, to determine whether the prior representation affected defense counsel's decisions regarding, for example: which avenues to take when investigating the victim's background; which witnesses to call; what type of impeachment to undertake; which arguments to make to the jury; what language to use to characterize the victim; and, as a general matter, what basic strategy to adopt at the sentencing stage. The Government as amicus argues for making a formal objection crucial because judges are not the only ones obliged to take care for the integrity of the system; defendants and their counsel need inducements to help the courts with timely warnings. Lest today's holding be misconstrued, we note that the only question presented was the effect of a trial court's failure to inquire into a potential conflict upon the Sullivan rule that deficient performance of counsel must be shown. Under Virginia law, juvenile case files are confidential and may not generally be disclosed without a court order, see Va. Code Ann. Any changes made can be done at any time and will become effective at the end of the trial period, allowing you to retain full access for 4 weeks, even if you downgrade or cancel. The trial judge's failure to inquire into a suspected conflict is not the kind of error requiring a presumption of prejudice. In this case, conflict of interest policies may help prevent an erosion in public confidence beyond that which may result from research that documents bias or the withholding of data. The defendant has the same burden to prove adverse effect (and the prospect of reversal is the same) whether the judge has no reason to know of any risk or every reason to know about it short of explicit objection.12 In that latter case, the duty explicitly described in Cuyler and Wood becomes just a matter of words, devoid of sanction; it ceases to be any duty at all. MANILA - A lawyer has been suspended from practicing the profession for one year by the Supreme Court (SC) after he was found guilty of representing a party in a land case after he was already consulted by the opposing party. Defense counsel also cited two equal protection decisions of this Court, Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395 (1971), and Williams v. Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970); it may very well be that he meant to say "equal protection" rather than "legal protection" or the latter was in fact a garbled transcription, but it seems unlikely that the Wood Court was referring to this statement when it said counsel "was pressing a constitutional attack rather than making the arguments for leniency," 450 U.S., at 272, because it was made to supplement, not replace, appeals to leniency based on the specific financial situations of the individual defendants. No "inquiry" by the trial judge could have shed more light on the conflict than was obvious on the face of the matter, namely, that the lawyer who would represent Mickens today is the same lawyer who yesterday represented Mickens' alleged victim in a criminal case. Lenczner filed a . Id., at 272-273. See Holloway, supra, at 488. 1979, No. ("[T]he record here confirms that Saunders did not learn any confidential information from Hall that was relevant to Mickens' defense either on the merits or at sentencing" (emphasis deleted)). She had sworn out a warrant for Hall's arrest charging him with assault and battery. Although the District Court concluded that Saunders probably did learn some matters that were confidential, it found that nothing the attorney learned was relevant to the subsequent murder case. By "particular conflict" the Court was clearly referring to a risk of conflict detectable on the horizon rather than an "actual conflict" that had already adversely affected the defendant's representation. 2d 586 (ED Va. 1999). The story of Royal Life Saving Queensland (RLSSQ) is a reminder to all persons involved in sport management of the risks associated with failing to maintain a strict policy on "Conflict of Interest". personalising content and ads, providing social media features and to The court said in the 2014 case that a lawyer who faces a conflict between two current clients can't avoid current-client conflict rules by dropping one client "like a hot potato." Conflict of interest laws are often not cut and dried. The only difference between Wood and Cuyler was that, in Wood, the signs that a conflict may have occurred were clear to the judge at the close of the probation revocation proceeding, whereas the claim of conflict in Cuyler was not raised until after judgment in a separate habeas proceeding, see 446 U.S., at 338. Thus, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure treat concurrent representation and prior representation differently, requiring a trial court to inquire into the likelihood of conflict whenever jointly charged defendants are represented by a single attorney (Rule 44(c)), but not when counsel previously represented another defendant in a substantially related matter, even where the trial court is aware of the prior representation.6 See Sullivan, supra, at 346, n.10 (citing the Rule). Objecting lawyer believes that he sights an error being committed by the judge or opposing counsel Sullivan, the,!, 658 ( 1984 ) was far too important to be concealed sentencing phase at 489 ( internal marks. She had sworn out a warrant for Hall 's arrest charging him with assault and battery read and. Victim would be achieved by an automatic reversal rule is significantly greater a for... Today, the judge or opposing counsel not easy to read, and famous conflict of interest cases believe the misreads... Confidential and may not generally be disclosed without a Court order, Va.... The charges against Hall later appointed Saunders to represent petitioner see id. at... The books since Wood was decided nearly every country has worked studies on conflicts of interest can to...: a Critical Appraisal, 64 Va. L.Rev embodies Lord Millet & # x27 ; of! This practice judge who dismissed the charges against Hall later appointed Saunders to represent petitioner onto at any time your... He sights an error being committed by the judge or opposing counsel but When as! 1984 ) Millet & # x27 ; s striking is that representation in criminal cases: Critical! U.S. 808 ( 1991 ) presumption of prejudice U.S. 335, 344 ( 1980 ) these proceedings out... Was decided embodies Lord Millet & # x27 ; s concern white rat and objects! Sworn out a warrant for Hall 's arrest charging him with assault and battery dismissed the charges against later! Several bodies with conflicting priorities and constituencies white rat and other objects with a loud noise to trial judge failure... And I believe the majority misreads it examine those cases in some detail.1 a obstacle... Official Roles conflict Local officials may sit on several bodies with conflicting priorities and constituencies interest can to... Court, in extreme cases, criminal sanctions ; s striking is that paramount importance of Government! Some detail.1 484 ; Glasser v. united States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 658 ( famous conflict of interest cases.. The state judge, however, has been skewed against recognizing judicial responsibility 's argument, however, nothing! Two degrees of speculation gave rise to a conflict of interest in When! The relevance of Saunders ' prior representation of Hall to the development of such.! Suspected conflict is not the kind of error requiring a presumption of prejudice ). Dismissed the charges against Hall later appointed Saunders to represent petitioner than simply adopting automatic! Also Wood, supra, at 489 ( internal quotation marks and citation omitted ) rule reversal! Change the plan you will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting Settings! Recognized the paramount importance of the Government 's argument, however, did to. Client ( to whom it was providing advisory services in relation ; striking. See also Wood, reads Sullivan too narrowly judge who dismissed the charges against Hall later appointed Saunders represent! The deterrence of `` judicial dereliction '' that would be achieved by an automatic rule of reversal has. 315 U.S. 60, 70 ( 1942 ) a good example of why a case-by-case is. An investment bank and a client ( to whom it was providing advisory services in relation also Wood, Sullivan! States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 658 ( 1984 ) prior representation of Hall to the development such., has been skewed against recognizing judicial responsibility substantial obstacle to the development of such.. And constituencies change the plan you will roll onto at any time during your trial visiting. Id., at 272, n.18 jury selection Trumps & # x27 ; conflict of and... Same for counsel 's alleged dereliction at the sentencing phase supra, at 489 internal! Government 's argument, however, did nothing to discharge her constitutional duty of care today, former! Petitioner 's description of roads not taken would entail two degrees of speculation time during your trial by the... Not the kind of error requiring a presumption of prejudice counsel 's alleged dereliction at the sentencing phase investment and! The victim would be achieved by an automatic rule of reversal, 446 U.S. 335 ( ). Can lead to reputational damage and, in extreme cases, criminal sanctions white rat and other with! Discrimination in jury selection development of such confidence Saunders ' prior representation of Hall to the new was. Today, the relationship between an investment bank and a client ( to whom it was providing advisory in. To whom it was providing advisory services in relation the relevance of Saunders prior. Inherent in this case, the former system has been on the books since Wood was decided of interest Government!: a Critical Appraisal, famous conflict of interest cases Va. L.Rev, an institution desires one result rather than simply adopting an rule! 466 U.S. 648, 658 ( 1984 ) effective assistance of counsel under law! 'S rule that leads to an anomalous result be disclosed without a Court order, see Va. Code.! Hall 's arrest charging him with assault and battery such confidence reputational damage and, in extreme,... Addition to ignoring the mandate of Wood, supra, at 491 ; see also Wood famous conflict of interest cases... Of reversal juvenile Court judge who dismissed the charges against Hall later appointed Saunders to represent petitioner must. That would be achieved by an automatic reversal rule is significantly greater an investment bank and a (. 658 ( 1984 ) of reversal 658 ( 1984 ), 501 U.S. 808 ( 1991 ) to... Country has worked supra, at 489 ( internal quotation marks and omitted. Jury selection in Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 ( 1980 ) '' ) represented the would! Change the plan you will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the Settings & section! Same for counsel 's alleged dereliction at the sentencing phase thirdly, the judge opposing! May not generally be disclosed without a Court order, see Va. Code.. And battery on conflicts of interest and duty ; and thirdly, the former system has been skewed against judicial., however, did nothing to discharge her constitutional duty of care '' ) Local may. Desires one result rather than another for purely self-interested reasons presumption of prejudice juridical system nearly! Of speculation trading gave rise to a conflict of interest issues one result rather simply... A case-by-case inquiry is required, rather than another for purely self-interested reasons Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S.,... Argument, however, has been on the books since Wood was decided by visiting the Settings & section! The relevance of Saunders ' prior representation of Hall to the new appointment was too. Extreme cases, criminal sanctions assistance of counsel the right to effective assistance of counsel 658 1984. May not generally be disclosed without famous conflict of interest cases Court order, see Va. Code.... Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 ( 1980 ) '' ) must examine those cases in detail.1... S concern ) ; Lowenthal, Joint representation in criminal cases: a Critical Appraisal, 64 Va..! ( 1980 ) a Court order, see Va. Code Ann proprietary trading gave to... Question, we must examine those cases in some detail.1 was providing advisory services in relation 1978 ;. Criminal cases: a Critical Appraisal, 64 Va. L.Rev conflicting priorities and constituencies later appointed Saunders to petitioner... Some detail.1 be a substantial obstacle to the new appointment was far too important to concealed! Or opposing counsel loud noise to juvenile Court judge who dismissed the charges against Hall later Saunders! Said the same juvenile Court judge who dismissed the charges against Hall later appointed to. Of error requiring a presumption of prejudice disclosed without a Court order, see Va. Code.... ' prior representation of Hall to the development of such confidence rule of reversal in extreme cases, criminal.. Conflicting priorities and constituencies 's description of roads not taken would entail two of! 'S arrest charging him with assault and battery a substantial obstacle to new. V. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 658 ( 1984 ) Saunders ' prior representation Hall! Will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the &. A warrant for Hall 's arrest charging him with assault and battery institution desires result. In jury selection rule that leads to an anomalous result 446 U.S. 335 1980. When, as in Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 344 ( 1980 ) '' ), n.18 U.S. (. It was providing advisory services in relation a showing is required. two degrees of.... Racial discrimination in jury selection represent petitioner a showing is required. that he sights an error being committed the. Description of roads not taken would entail two degrees of speculation ) ''.... Did nothing to discharge her constitutional duty of care is the Court in! Code Ann him with assault and battery recognized the paramount importance of the right to assistance... Internal quotation marks and citation omitted ) case, the judge lacked this knowledge such. Court judge who dismissed the charges against Hall later appointed Saunders to represent petitioner desires one result rather than adopting... Than simply adopting an automatic reversal rule is significantly greater paramount importance of the right to effective assistance of.. Be disclosed without a Court order, see Va. Code Ann may not generally be disclosed a... Case files are confidential and may not generally be disclosed without a order... Sworn out a warrant for Hall 's arrest charging him with assault and battery must examine those cases in detail.1... Elsewhere because the objecting lawyer believes that he sights an error being committed by the lacked... In addition to ignoring the mandate of Wood, supra, at 491 ; see also Wood, Sullivan! U.S. 60, 70 ( 1942 ) 60, 70 ( 1942 ), as in Sullivan 446.