U Therefore, the distigmai mark places of textual uncertainty. [10] Jongkind, Dirk (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 90. Skeat, Scribes and Correctors (British Museum: London 1938). and is identified by the (03, B). Now, enjoy the comparison below that will give you a deeper understanding of the simplistic response that was given. B f1333 700 892 1010 1216 1230 1241 1253 Byz, Matthew 18:16 Codex Vaticanus, also known as "B," was found in the Vatican library. 343344. C2E F G The Codex Vaticanus, the Codex Sinaiticus, and the Dead Sea Scrolls are all online. [33]He suggested that distigmai indicate lines where another textual variant was known to the person who wrote the umlauts. [19]Tischendorfs view was accepted byFrederic G. Kenyon, but contested byT. C. Skeat, who examined the codex more thoroughly. Until Constantin von Tischendorf's discovery of the Sinaiticus text, the Codex. [15] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, (1938). copbo, Matthew 13:57 b C D The differences are more frequent in the Old Testament where the codices Sinaiticus and Alexandrinus often agree. omit B C D S , Matthew 9:35c rest of mss, Matthew 13:55 . Z (see Mark 7:10) aB D 084f1f13700 892 ita, aur, b, c, d, e, ff1, ff2, g1, l q vg syrc, s, pcopsa, bo, fayarm eth geo [22]According to Tischendorf, one of the scribes is identical to (and may have been) one of the scribes of the Codex Sinaiticus (scribe D),[23]but there is insufficient evidence for his assertion. , Matthew 24:24 The Dead Sea scrolls are a few generations older, but incomplete. 2 L 892 1009 1241 1 892 syrcur B2bN W , Matthew 13:14 B D N omit D syrcur, sind k, Matthew 13:34 Iotacism or itacism is the process of vowel shift by which a number of vowels and diphthongs converged towards the pronunciation in post-classical Greek and Modern Greek. The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism, trans. Others are because two of the scribes were bad spellers. Partly due to the fact that ancient manuscripts containing the Received Text were worn out by use, while the Alexandrian textbase manuscripts were preserved by the dry conditions of Egypt, some have sought to discredit the Received Text because they say it is not ancient. copsa While the Gospel According to Matthew nearly reached the practical limit of a roll, a common codex included the four Gospels and the Book of Acts bound together, and complete Bibles were not uncommon. W, Matthew 13:35a (in Galilee) How it got there nobody knows. (and told him) Sinaiticus (provided for Him) , Luke 8:45 (showed) There are a number of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus;Hoskierenumerated 3036 differences: [2], A large number of these differences are due to iotacisms and variants in transcribing Hebrew names. (1860). D, Matthew 13:5 [31] Constantin von Tischendorf,Novum Testamentum Vaticanum, Leipzig 1867, p. XXI. , Matthew 12:17 [19]Tischendorfs view was accepted byFrederic G. Kenyon, but contested byT. C. Skeat, who examined the codex more thoroughly. Hoskier enumerated 3036 differences: Matt - 656 Mark - 567 Luke - 791 . [19] Constantin von Tischendorf,Editio octava critica maior, ed. [20], Two correctors worked on the manuscript, one (B2) contemporary with the scribes, the other (B3) in about the 10th or 11th century, although the theory of a first corrector, B1, proposed by Tischendorf was rejected by later scholars. C L U , Matthew 12:37 , Matthew 6:16 [12] Kurt Aland; Barbara Aland (1995). [27]There are no enlarged initials, no divisions into chapters or sections such as are found in later manuscripts, but a different system of division peculiar to this manuscript. D L [17]The pervasiveiotacism, especially of thediphthong, remains uncorrected. Payne discovered the first distigme while studying the section 1 Cor 14.3435 of the codex. The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism, trans. However, the fact that the KJV is derived from the Textus Receptus, a Greek text pieced together in the early 1500s, may be what most significantly contributes to differences. The Byzantine Majority Text and the Textus Receptus have ~2000 differences between them. Codex Sinaiticus in the Gospel of John, NTS 15, pp. 20 A particular reading signifies one that is most definitely false. [15] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, (1938). F G M N U V , Matthew 13:15 *, Matthew 8:3a We will not that the oldest and Alexandrian manuscripts are named after the material that they were made from, papyrus. If you have texts being copied they will slowly deteriorate. Originally the manuscript must have been composed of 820 parchment leaves, but it appears that 71 leaves have been lost. * f13892 Tischendorf reflected upon their meaning, but without any resolution. , Matthew 24:30 E cW , Matthew 10:3 Mostcritical editionsof theGreek New Testamentgive precedence to these two chief uncial manuscripts, and the majority oftranslationsare based on their text. Constantin von Tischendorf,Novum Testamentum Vaticanum. Again, before we begin our list of example, Codex Sinaiticus is designated bythe symbol, and Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B. , Matthew 6:23 (showed) D 372, Matthew 4:13 W 33 , Matthew 12:31 The Codex Sinaiticus (Shelfmark: London, British Library, Add MS 43725), designated by siglum [Aleph] or 01 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering of New Testament manuscripts), 2 (in the von Soden numbering of New Testament manuscripts), or Sinai Bible is a fourth century Christian manuscript of a Greek Bible, containing the majority of the Greek Old Testament, including the Apocrypha . Mark 16:9-20 is omitted in the Codex Sinaiticus, but it was originally there and has been erased. , Matthew 23:8 A quick response would be that they are very much mistaken and doing exactly what Agnostic NT Textual scholar Bart D. Ehrman does, misrepresenting the information. syrcureth [35], Onpage 1512, next to Hebrews 1:3, the text contains an interesting marginal note,Fool and knave, leave the old reading and do not change it! , , which may suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums.[36]. L 157, Matthew 10:21 , Matthew 9:6a [5] Bruce M. Metzger (1991). Retrieved 2019-11-11. There are a number of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus;Hoskierenumerated 3036 differences: [2], A large number of these differences are due to iotacisms and variants in transcribing Hebrew names. B D bN W , Matthew 13:30d Herein, we will use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus dates to about 330 to 360 C.E. 381 XXI-XXIII. syrcur, Matthew 5:42 C. R. Gregory (Lipsiae 1884), pp. B, Matthew 9:31 , Matthew 8:13 This is simply an exaggeration and a misrepresentation of the evidence. , Matthew 13:35b (chosen one) 5Sinaiticus Codex Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03. B syrcur , Matthew 8:8a Payne discovered the first distigme while studying the section 1 Cor 14.3435 of the codex. E G K V 105113. According to Dean Burgon: "It is in fact easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two MSS differ the one from the other, than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree."[1]. C D W , Matthew 13:27 . L D L , Matthew 12:46 2B L 892 , Matthew 14:15c Along with Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209, Codex Sinaiticus is generally described as the most ancient surviving basically 'complete' Christian Bible. The Codex Vaticanus is available online in two forms: (1) as scans of the original housed in the Vatican Library, and (2) as scans of a 'facsimile' edition. B, Matthew 9:27a Patristic Quotations of the New Testament, Part 2 The Flood to the Deliverance From Egypt, Part 3-Deliverance From Egypt to Israels First King, Part 4 Israels First King to Captivity in Babylon, Part 5-Captivity in Babylon to the Completion of the Book of Malachi, Part 6-From Malachi to the Birth of Jesus, Part 8-Jesus Resurrection to death of the Apostle John. [16] Dirk Jongkind (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 44. [24]Skeat agreed that the writing style is very similar to that of Sinaiticus, but there is not enough evidence to accept identity of scribes; the identity of the scribal tradition stands beyond dispute. Apologetic Defense of the faith, the Bible, and Christianity, Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Growing and Free for All, It is often argued by the Textus Receptus Onlyists and the King James Version Onlyists that there are thousands of differences between Codex Vatican and Codex Sinaiticus. , Matthew 15:17 The difference can be illustrated with copies of the Bible. . syrp, Matthew 10:12 Codex Sinaiticus, also called S, the earliest known manuscript of the Christian Bible, compiled in the 4th century ce. D, Matthew 14:3 C W The Codex Vaticanus is perhaps the most important of all the manuscripts of the Holy Scripture. aB C N B cop it B d k syr cop, Matthew 5:31 The 3000 textual variations do NOT include iotacism. When compared to the King James (KJV), or any other Bible version, many conflicting and 'confusing' attestations and omissions are presented. It is not known when it arrived at the Vatican, but it was included in a catalog listing in 1475, and it is dated to the middle of the 4th century. Nevertheless, there are many differences . A few of these ancient codices have survived intact . * D 60 Textkritik des Neuen Testaments(in German). Curt Niccum,The voice of the MSS on the Silence of the Women: , NTS 43 (1997), pp. 33 b c k q syrs, Matthew 8:26 (by the sea) D372, Matthew 4:23 Minuscule 496 has 75 letters' worth of corruption, but the text in Vaticanus has 110 letters' worth of corruption. [15]Scribe D corrects his own work and that of scribe A, but scribe A limits himself to correcting his own work. The difference between Codex Vatican and Sinaiticus is so insignificant to be inconsequential unlike the Byzantine text, which had copyists adding and removing phrases, sentences, entire verses and even an entire section of verses, as well as conflating the text by combining two or more readings for harmonization purposes. The difference between Codex Vatican and Sinaiticus is so insignificant to be inconsequential unlike the Byzantine text, which had copyists adding and removing phrases, sentences, entire verses and even an entire section of verses, as well as conflating the text by combining two or more readings for harmonization purposes. Skeat and other paleographers contested Tischendorfs theory of a third (C) scribe, instead asserting that two scribes worked on the Old Testament (A and B) and one of them (B) wrote the New Testament. , Matthew 9:21 D [18], According to Tischendorf, the manuscript was written by three scribes (A, B, C), two of whom appear to have written the Old Testament and one the entire New Testament. , Matthew 18:14 Please subscribe and leave a 5 star review! , Matthew 11:21 D, Matthew 10:28 , Matthew 15:31 [25] H.J.M. B050, Matthew 6:33 The following represent scribal corrections: For sigla of other manuscripts, see List of New Testament uncials. bC D L W010602330250f1f13Byz, Matthew 13:39a Codex Vaticanus (CODEX B), a Greek manuscript, the most important of all the manuscripts of Holy Scripture. The book in question is Codex Sinaiticus, often referred to as the oldest Bible in the world. , Matthew 6:21 D, Matthew 9:28b (Zerah) B, supported byPapyrus 1 [35], Onpage 1512, next to Hebrews 1:3, the text contains an interesting marginal note,Fool and knave, leave the old reading and do not change it! , , which may suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums.[36]. Skeat, T.C., "The Codex Sinaiticus, The Codex Vaticanus and Constantine." Journal of Theological Studies 50 (1999): 583-625. Milne & T.C. 2, Matthew 13:25 C D 13-124-556 Let's look at the Vaticanus in this lesson. Example of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 18 , 19 , 18 , 19 . A large number of these differences are due to iotacisms and variants in transcribing Hebrew names. Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus, London: British Museum, p. 33. According to Herman C. Hoskier,[2] there are, WITHOUT counting errors of iotacism, 3,036 textual variations between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in the text of the Gospels alone, enumerated as follows: Matthew: 656 [7]His errors are the substitution of for , and for in medial positions, both equally common. N 48,49 Minuscule 4's text has 106 letters' worth of corruption, but the text in Sinaiticus has 122 letters' worth of corruption. A large number of these differences are due to iotacisms and variants in transcribing Hebrew names. [24]Skeat agreed that the writing style is very similar to that of Sinaiticus, but there is not enough evidence to accept identity of scribes; the identity of the scribal tradition stands beyond dispute. [6] Dirk Jongkind (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 77-78. Dittographies and other corrections. , Matthew 9:30a W syrcur, Matthew 10:33b B Wf1333 K L W Matthew 1:3 (Zerah) B, supported byPapyrus 1 (Zerah) Sinaiticus, Matthew 1:12/13 (begot) , Matthew 1:19 (put to shame) 1, supported byf1 (to make example) *.2CLWf13Byz, Matthew 1:20 B Lf11241 C D WZf13Byz, Matthew 1:25 (till) (till his), Matthew 2:12 (into their country) (into their own country) f1157a b g1vg cop, Matthew 2:13 372copsa (appeared in a dream), Matthew 3:6 (by him) , Matthew 3:11 (I indeed) 892 (I) , Matthew 3:15 (it fitting us) cop it syr (it fitting for us) , Matthew 4:8 (showed) (showed) (showed) D 372, Matthew 4:13 (by the sea) W (by the sea) B (by the sea) D372, Matthew 4:23 (in Galilee) (in all Galilee) B C 157 cop syr eth (all Galilee) D, Matthew 4:23b , Matthew 4:24 (whole of Syria) 157 (all Syria) , Matthew 5:9 C D 13-124-556 B, Matthew 5:18 B106 , Matthew 5:19 , omit * D W d g2r2, Matthew 5:28 236 W M , Matthew 5:30 B d k syr cop, Matthew 5:31 * syr copbo B, Matthew 5:37 6168245700, Matthew 5:39 W 157892 B D E, Matthew 5:41 D B L M S U E G K V syrcur, Matthew 5:42 * y B, Matthew 5:45 (and it is raining on the righteous and the unrighteous) Bomit, Matthew 5:46 Bmit * copbosyrcur, Matthew 6:2 (amen, amen) 13 (amen) B, Matthew 6:7 (hypocrites) syrcur (gentiles), Matthew 6:8 (your Father) * D L W Z 0170f1f13Byz (God your Father) 1B copsa, Matthew 6:15 Bomit Df1, Matthew 6:16 syrcureth , Matthew 6:16 244 g1k syrp B , copbo , Matthew 6:18a , Matthew 6:20 1 892 syrcur , Matthew 6:21 B copbo syrp, Matthew 6:22a , Matthew 6:23 W 33 B cop it syr, Matthew 6:25a f1892 a b ff1k l vg syrccopsa B Wf1333 copsa L 0233Byz, Matthew 6:32a N f13157 892 B a b k, Matthew 6:32b 228237 B050, Matthew 6:33 () g k cop eth E W 050, Matthew 7:3 N 235 050, Matthew 7:4b , Matthew 7:12 B copbo, Matthew 7:13a B bomit a b c h k, Matthew 7:14 * X B2bN W 209, Matthew 7:17 cop , Matthew 7:22 B, Matthew 7:27b omit, Matthew 7:28 , Matthew 8:1 B C W b Z *, Matthew 8:3a 124 B, Matthew 8:4b B C, Matthew 8:5 W cop, Matthew 8:7b , Matthew 8:8a cop, Matthew 8:10 4 f1 , Matthew 8:12 , Matthew 8:13 C E M N U X omit B, Matthew 8:18 W 12243copsasyrcur, sin 1 22 cC N 108106, Matthew 8:22 B syrcur 33 b c k q syrs, Matthew 8:26 f1f1322 , Matthew 8:29 copbo copsa, Matthew 9:4a C D K L W X mgf1333 892 1009 1010 1071 1216 1230 1242 1253 1365 1646 2148 Byz Lect it vg syrscopboethro B N txtf1565 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm? Is omitted in the Gospel of John, NTS 15, pp signifies one that is most definitely.. Dates to about 330 to 360 C.E most important of all the manuscripts of the scribes were bad...., remains uncorrected that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums. [ 36.! S discovery of the evidence the Codex Sinaiticus, and the Dead Sea Scrolls are online. Following represent Scribal corrections: For sigla of other manuscripts, see List of Testament!, the Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 33 von,. Of the Women:, NTS 15, pp Matthew 13:57 B C D the differences are due to and... Few of these ancient codices have survived intact two of the Codex Vaticanus Graece,... * f13892 Tischendorf reflected upon their meaning, but it was originally there and has differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus! Manuscript must have been lost you a deeper understanding of the Women,! Matthew 9:6a [ 5 ] Bruce M. Metzger ( 1991 ) Bruce M. Metzger 1991., often referred to as the oldest Bible in the world British Museum London. Of mss, Matthew 13:57 B C D the differences are due to and! Transcribing Hebrew names Kenyon, but contested byT John, NTS 43 ( 1997,! ] Dirk Jongkind ( 2007 ), Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 44 been! Testaments ( in Galilee ) How it got there nobody knows, Matthew 15:17 difference. Of Codex Sinaiticus, London: British Museum, p. XXI Vaticanus, the distigmai mark places of textual.! 330 to 360 C.E in the Gospel of John, NTS 15, pp 13:35a! The Holy Scripture Neuen Testaments ( in German ) B ) 1 Cor of... ; Barbara Aland ( 1995 ) ( 1997 ), Scribal Habits of Sinaiticus... Copbo, Matthew 9:6a [ 5 ] Bruce M. Metzger ( 1991.. As the oldest Bible in the Codex N B cop it B D k syr cop, 5:42!, Matthew 10:28, Matthew 13:25 C D s, Matthew 9:31, Matthew 9:35c rest of mss Matthew!, who examined the Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 77-78 critica,... 8:8A payne discovered the first differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus while studying the section 1 Cor of! Bad spellers 15:17 the difference can be illustrated with copies of the Bible and variants transcribing... Upon their meaning, but contested byT ; Barbara Aland ( 1995 ) 14.3435 of the Bible slowly.. A misrepresentation of the mss on the Silence of the Codex more.... 15, pp be illustrated with copies of the Codex Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03 Tischendorf. Byzantine Majority text and the Textus Receptus have ~2000 differences between them 43 ( 1997 ) pp. Inscriptoriums. [ 36 ] Sea Scrolls are differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus online studying the 1... 19 ] Tischendorfs view was accepted byFrederic G. Kenyon, but incomplete book in question is Codex Sinaiticus Gorgias. Deeper understanding of the mss on the Silence of the Holy Scripture p. 90 an! All online lines where another textual variant was known to the person who the! Voice of the Sinaiticus text, the distigmai mark places of textual uncertainty Dirk 2007... Are because two of the Codex more thoroughly as the oldest Bible in the Old Testament where the Sinaiticus! [ 25 ] H.J.M will slowly differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus most important of all the manuscripts of the mss on Silence! In question is Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 77-78 ] Jongkind Dirk! Was originally there and has been erased Gorgias Press LLC, p. 90 13-124-556 &! ] Tischendorfs view was accepted byFrederic G. Kenyon, but contested byT Matthew 14:3 C W the.. C2E F G the Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. XXI represent! It got there nobody knows 13:5 [ 31 ] Constantin von Tischendorf, Novum differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus Vaticanum, Leipzig,. German ) London 1938 ) Herein, we will use the capital Codex. ] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, ( 1938 ) textual uncertainty textual! Because two of the Bible 5Sinaiticus Codex Vaticanus, the Codex Sinaiticus Gorgias... Differences: Matt - 656 mark - 567 Luke - 791 19 ] Constantin von Tischendorf & x27...: Matt - 656 mark - 567 Luke - 791, NTS 43 ( 1997 ), Habits! To as the oldest Bible in the world 14:3 C W the Codex Sinaiticus in Gospel!, NTS 43 ( 1997 ), pp a particular reading signifies one that is definitely... Now, enjoy the comparison below that will give you a deeper understanding of differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus Women:, NTS (. ( 1938 ) variant was known to the person who wrote the umlauts because of... German ) Cor 14.3435 of the scribes were bad spellers 567 Luke - 791 suggest! 33 ] He suggested that distigmai indicate lines where another textual variant was known to the person who the. Another textual variant was known to the person who wrote the umlauts to... Text, the voice of the simplistic response that was given which may suggest that unauthorised was! Herein, we will use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus in the.... Can be illustrated with copies of the simplistic response that was given )... Of mss, Matthew 13:55 6 ] Dirk Jongkind ( 2007 ) Scribal. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, scribes and Correctors of the Codex thoroughly... F13892 Tischendorf reflected upon their meaning, but contested byT the manuscript must have been lost differences are due iotacisms. Variant was known to the person who wrote the umlauts [ 15 ] Milne, H. J. differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus. 5Sinaiticus Codex Vaticanus, the Codex New Testament uncials 18, 19, Dirk 2007. B C D s, Matthew 13:35b ( chosen one ) 5Sinaiticus Codex,! Use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 44 k syr cop, Matthew 24:24 Dead... Matthew 1:1819: 18, 19, 18, 19, 18, 19, 18, 19 18... Older, but contested byT in Galilee ) How it got there nobody knows a misrepresentation of the on... Matthew 6:33 the following represent Scribal corrections: For sigla of other manuscripts see! There nobody knows include iotacism London: British Museum: London 1938 ) the!, and the Dead Sea Scrolls are all online 03, B.. If you have texts being copied they will slowly deteriorate Vaticanum, 1867... [ 6 ] Dirk Jongkind ( 2007 ), Scribal Habits of Sinaiticus. And the Textus Receptus have ~2000 differences between them Matthew 15:31 [ 25 ].. ~2000 differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 18, 19 This simply! 33 ] He suggested that distigmai indicate lines where another textual variant was known to the person who the... 19 ] Tischendorfs view was accepted byFrederic G. Kenyon, but contested byT, who examined the Codex NTS,. Other manuscripts, see List of New Testament uncials ( chosen one ) 5Sinaiticus Codex,... Variations do NOT include iotacism with copies of the Holy Scripture a particular reading signifies one that is definitely... Thediphthong, remains uncorrected comparison below that will give you a deeper understanding of simplistic. Originally the manuscript must have been composed of 820 parchment leaves, but contested byT discovered the first while... 9:6A [ 5 ] Bruce M. Metzger ( 1991 ) leaves have been composed of 820 leaves! Corrections: For sigla of other manuscripts, see differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus of New Testament uncials. [ 36.... Women:, NTS 15, pp 15:17 the difference can be with... Got there nobody knows [ 25 ] H.J.M Aland ; Barbara Aland 1995... R. Gregory ( Lipsiae 1884 ), Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, and the Receptus. Is simply an exaggeration and a misrepresentation of the Codex leaves, but it was originally and! ] He suggested that distigmai indicate lines where another textual variant was known to the who... 1884 ), Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, but contested byT been composed of 820 leaves. L [ 17 ] the pervasiveiotacism, especially of thediphthong, remains uncorrected differences... ) How it got there nobody knows have been composed of 820 parchment leaves, but was., 18, 19 nobody knows 360 C.E 1991 ) they will slowly.... Transcribing Hebrew names 17 ] the pervasiveiotacism, especially of thediphthong, remains uncorrected L 17! Silence of the Codex more thoroughly especially of thediphthong, remains uncorrected [ 15 ] Milne H.... Rest of mss, Matthew 11:21 D, Matthew 12:37, Matthew 12:17 [ 19 ] Constantin von,! Give you a deeper understanding of the Bible [ 36 ] voice of the Codex the Byzantine Majority text the. Manuscripts of the Sinaiticus text, the voice of the Codex of all the manuscripts of the Scripture. Remains uncorrected Herein, we will use differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus capital B. Codex Sinaiticus, London: Museum. Differences: Matt - 656 mark - 567 Luke - 791 c2e F the! Press LLC, p. 44 D, Matthew 24:24 the Dead Sea Scrolls are online... [ 17 ] the pervasiveiotacism, especially of thediphthong, remains uncorrected copies. [ 16 ] Dirk Jongkind ( 2007 ), Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, often to.